Alexander Hamilton’s recommendation for creating a national bank is an example of(1 point) Responses a violation of states’ rights. a violation of states’ rights. a power given by the federal government. a power given by the federal government. a loose interpretation of the Constitution. a loose interpretation of the Constitution. a strict interpretation of the Constitution.
a loose interpretation of the Constitution.
Alexander Hamilton's recommendation for creating a national bank is an example of a power given by the federal government.
To determine whether Alexander Hamilton’s recommendation for creating a national bank is an example of a violation of states’ rights, a power given by the federal government, a loose interpretation of the Constitution, or a strict interpretation of the Constitution, we need to carefully analyze the historical context and Hamilton's arguments.
Alexander Hamilton, as the first Secretary of the Treasury, proposed the creation of a national bank as a part of his economic plan to promote economic growth, establish financial stability, and strengthen the federal government's power. He argued that the federal government had the power, under the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution (also known as the Elastic Clause), to create a national bank.
If we look at the options provided, we can eliminate the duplicate answers (duplicated due to an error). Now, let's examine the remaining options:
- A violation of states’ rights: A national bank, in Hamilton's view, would help harmonize the banking system across states and enhance the federal government's control over the economy. Some argued that this violated states' rights, as it centralized power in the federal government. Therefore, this option is a possible choice.
- A power given by the federal government: Hamilton's argument was based on his interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause, which grants the federal government the authority to make laws necessary for executing its powers. He believed that creating a national bank fell under this clause, thereby giving the federal government the power to establish such an institution.
- A loose interpretation of the Constitution: Hamilton's argument for creating a national bank was based on a broad interpretation of the Constitution, particularly the Necessary and Proper Clause. He believed that the federal government could exercise powers not explicitly listed in the Constitution as long as they were necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers. Therefore, this option is a possible choice.
- A strict interpretation of the Constitution: A strict interpretation of the Constitution means adhering strictly to the enumerated powers granted to the federal government. It does not allow for broad interpretations or the exercise of powers not explicitly stated in the Constitution. Since Hamilton argued that the creation of a national bank was within the federal government's authority through the Necessary and Proper Clause, his recommendation is not an example of a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Therefore, this option can be eliminated.
Based on the analysis, the correct answer is likely "a violation of states' rights" and "a loose interpretation of the Constitution."