Alexander Hamilton’s recommendation for creating a national bank is an example of(1 point) Responses a strict interpretation of the Constitution. a strict interpretation of the Constitution. a loose interpretation of the Constitution. a loose interpretation of the Constitution. a power given by the federal government. a power given by the federal government. a violation of states’ rights.
a loose interpretation of the Constitution.
Alexander Hamilton's recommendation for creating a national bank is an example of a loose interpretation of the Constitution.
Alexander Hamilton's recommendation for creating a national bank is an example of a loose interpretation of the Constitution.
To understand why, we can look at the context. Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury, proposed the creation of a national bank as part of his economic plan to establish a strong federal government and stabilize the economy. However, the Constitution does not explicitly grant the federal government the power to establish a bank. Therefore, Hamilton argued for a loose interpretation of the Constitution, asserting that the government has implied powers beyond what is specifically listed in the Constitution.
To find this answer, one could start by studying the historical context surrounding Hamilton's recommendation for a national bank. Understanding Hamilton's role as Secretary of the Treasury and his economic plan is crucial to comprehend his reasoning for advocating a national bank. Further research on the debate surrounding the creation of the bank and the viewpoints of the Founding Fathers would provide additional insight into the strict vs. loose interpretation of the Constitution. By analyzing the arguments made by Hamilton and his supporters, one can conclude that his recommendation reflects a loose interpretation of the Constitution.