Why was it very difficult to capture the speed of a running dog or the intensity of raindrops dropping in a puddle prior to the advances of modern photography? (1 point) Responses The human brain cannot process movement to capture it. The human brain cannot process movement to capture it. It is impossible to show motion with oil paints. It is impossible to show motion with oil paints. They moved too fast for the human eye. They moved too fast for the human eye. They moved too slow for the human eye.
They moved too fast for the human eye.
The correct response is: They moved too fast for the human eye.
The correct response is: They moved too fast for the human eye.
Before the advances of modern photography, capturing the speed of a running dog or the intensity of raindrops dropping in a puddle was very difficult because they moved too fast for the human eye to perceive and process. The human eye has certain limitations in terms of its ability to detect rapid motion. When objects move at high speeds, they quickly exceed the eye's ability to track them in detail. As a result, the eye perceives the motion as a blur rather than capturing the specific details of the movement. This made it challenging for artists to accurately depict motion in their paintings or visual representations using traditional mediums like oil paints. It was not until the emergence of photography that the ability to freeze motion and capture these fast-paced moments became possible. Photography allowed for a precise and accurate representation of movement, overcoming the limitations of human perception.