Which of the following constructs an argument in favor of U.S. annexation of the Philippines? (1 point)
A. • Economic reasons: Overseas possession are expensive and hard to manage.
B. • Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them.
C. • Racist ideology: White Americans way of life would be taken away.
D. • Trade reasons: Trade with Germany would increase dramatically.
B. • Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them.
Which of the following would most likely construct an argument against U.S. annexation of the Philippines? (1 point)
A. Sixto Lopez
B. National Association of Manufacturers
C. William McKinley
D. An imperialist
A. Sixto Lopez
Which of the following is the best argument in support of the Panama Canal? (1 point)
A. • Building the Panama Canal could lead to a conflict with Colombia.
B. • Building the Panama Canal could lead to a conflict with Colombia.
C. • Building the canal in Panama would be easier than getting legal rights to build in Nicaragua.
D. • Building the canal in Panama was a way to increase trade and control U.S. possessions in the Caribbean.
D. • Building the canal in Panama was a way to increase trade and control U.S. possessions in the Caribbean.
The argument in favor of U.S. annexation of the Philippines can be constructed using the following points:
1. Economic reasons: Overseas possessions are expensive and hard to manage. By annexing the Philippines, the U.S. could potentially gain economic benefits by having access to new markets and resources.
2. Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them. This argument assumes that the Filipinos are not capable of governing themselves effectively and that the U.S. has a responsibility to guide and govern them.
3. Trade reasons: Trade with Germany would increase dramatically. This argument suggests that by taking control of the Philippines, the U.S. could disrupt German trade and potentially gain a competitive advantage in global markets.
Therefore, the construct that best supports the argument in favor of U.S. annexation of the Philippines would be a combination of economic reasons, paternalism, and trade reasons. The correct option would be a combination of options A, B, and D.
To determine which of the following constructs an argument in favor of U.S. annexation of the Philippines, let's analyze each option:
A. Economic reasons: This argument suggests that overseas possessions are expensive and hard to manage. While this may be a valid point, it does not directly support the annexation of the Philippines.
B. Paternalism: This argument claims that Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them. This viewpoint presents a case in favor of annexation by emphasizing the need for U.S. intervention to govern and guide the Filipino population.
C. Racist ideology: This argument asserts that the way of life for white Americans would be taken away. While this viewpoint may exist, it does not specifically address the merits of annexing the Philippines.
D. Trade reasons: This argument suggests that trade with Germany would increase dramatically. However, this argument does not directly relate to the annexation of the Philippines.
Based on the analysis, the construct that presents an argument in favor of U.S. annexation of the Philippines is option B: Paternalism. It outlines the belief that the U.S. has a duty to manage the Filipinos as they are deemed unfit to rule themselves.