Which of the following correctly analyzes the effect the Supreme Court’s use of selective incorporation has had on the freedom of expression?(1 point) Responses Selective incorporation has limited the freedom of expression by only requiring the national government to abide by the freedom of speech. Selective incorporation has limited the freedom of expression by only requiring the national government to abide by the freedom of speech. Selective incorporation has expanded the freedom of expression by forcing states to protect the freedom of speech. Selective incorporation has expanded the freedom of expression by forcing states to protect the freedom of speech. Selective incorporation had no effect on the freedom of expression as states have always had to protect the freedom of speech. Selective incorporation had no effect on the freedom of expression as states have always had to protect the freedom of speech. Selective incorporation has gradually reduced freedom of expression by allowing states to ignore certain freedoms found in the Bill of Rights.
Selective incorporation has expanded the freedom of expression by forcing states to protect the freedom of speech.
The correct answer is:
Selective incorporation has expanded the freedom of expression by forcing states to protect the freedom of speech.
The correct answer is:
Selective incorporation has expanded the freedom of expression by forcing states to protect the freedom of speech.
To understand this, we need to explain what selective incorporation is and how it relates to the freedom of expression. Selective incorporation is a legal doctrine that applies specific provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This means that the Supreme Court can use selective incorporation to apply fundamental rights protected by the Constitution to state governments, not just the national government.
In the context of freedom of expression, selective incorporation has played a significant role. Prior to selective incorporation, the freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment, including freedom of speech, only applied to actions of the federal government. State governments were not explicitly bound by these freedoms.
Selective incorporation has expanded the freedom of expression by forcing states to protect the freedom of speech. Through landmark cases like Gitlow v. New York (1925), the Supreme Court has used selective incorporation to establish that the First Amendment protects freedom of speech from both federal and state government infringement. This means that states are now required to respect and protect the freedom of speech, not just the national government.
Therefore, the option "Selective incorporation has expanded the freedom of expression by forcing states to protect the freedom of speech" accurately analyzes the effect of selective incorporation on the freedom of expression.