How was British colonization of India different from its colonization of Nigeria?(1 point) Responses Paternalistic policies were used against India, but Nigeria was treated as an equal to the British government. Paternalistic policies were used against India, but Nigeria was treated as an equal to the British government. India was directly controlled by the British government, but Nigeria was allowed indirect control at first. India was directly controlled by the British government, but Nigeria was allowed indirect control at first. India was allowed indirect control, while Nigeria was directly controlled by the British government. India was allowed indirect control, while Nigeria was directly controlled by the British government. British-style education policies were promoted in Nigeria, while India used traditional religious education systems.
India was allowed indirect control, while Nigeria was directly controlled by the British government. India was subjected to direct British rule and governance, with British officials appointed to hold administrative positions. In contrast, Nigeria was initially governed indirectly through local rulers and traditional systems, although the British had significant influence and control over key aspects of governance and the economy.
India was directly controlled by the British government, while Nigeria was allowed indirect control at first.
To determine how British colonization of India was different from its colonization of Nigeria, we need to analyze the historical context and policies enforced by the British government in each region.
1. Paternalistic policies were used against India, but Nigeria was treated as an equal to the British government.
- To understand this difference, we need to examine the concept of paternalism. Paternalism refers to a governing approach where the colonizing power assumes a protective role over the colonized population, treating them as subjects in need of guidance and supervision. In India, the British adopted a paternalistic approach, imposing their own values, laws, and institutions while undermining indigenous systems of governance. However, in Nigeria, the British government initially treated certain regions as indirect control territories, allowing local rulers to maintain some authority, trade, and collect taxes under British supervision. This suggests that Nigeria was not subjected to the same level of paternalistic policies as India.
2. India was directly controlled by the British government, but Nigeria was allowed indirect control at first.
- In India, the British established direct control by appointing a governor-general and enforcing strict British control over governance, administration, and economic activities. However, in Nigeria, the British initially adopted the policy of indirect rule, relying on collaboration with local rulers and maintaining their existing administrative structures to fulfill colonial objectives. This approach allowed for a certain level of autonomy and self-rule in Nigeria, while India experienced direct governance by the British.
3. India was allowed indirect control, while Nigeria was directly controlled by the British government.
- This statement is incorrect as it contradicts the previous point discussed. India experienced direct control by the British government, while Nigeria initially had indirect control under the policy of indirect rule.
4. British-style education policies were promoted in Nigeria, while India used traditional religious education systems.
- There is evidence to support this statement. In Nigeria, the British government established schools that promoted British-style education, focusing on Western subjects and Christianity, with the intention of producing a Western-educated elite. On the other hand, in India, the British did not heavily promote their education system but rather supported traditional religious education systems. British policies in India aimed to diminish the influence of indigenous educational institutions and promote Western education primarily among the elite classes.
Based on the explanations provided, the correct answer would be: Paternalistic policies were used against India, but Nigeria was treated as an equal to the British government.