Which of the following offers the best comparison between
Hobbes’s and Locke’s perspectives on the divine right of
kings? (1 point)
Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave
people more freedom.
Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute
monarchs.
As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings.
The first option "Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad" offers the best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings.
The most accurate comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings would be:
Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs, while Locke saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
To determine which of the options offers the best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings, we need to analyze each option individually.
Option 1 states that both Hobbes and Locke saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad. This statement is incorrect as Hobbes actually supported the divine right of kings, whereas Locke questioned and challenged its legitimacy. Therefore, option 1 does not provide an accurate comparison.
Option 2 suggests that Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom. This statement is also inaccurate because Locke was a proponent of limited government and individual liberties. He believed that government derived its power from the consent of the governed, rather than from divine appointment. So, option 2 is not a valid comparison either.
Option 3 claims that Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs. This statement accurately reflects Hobbes's perspective. He believed that an absolute monarch was necessary to maintain social order and prevent chaos. However, it does not provide a comparison with Locke's perspective on the divine right of kings.
Option 4 states that both Hobbes and Locke accepted the divine right of kings as Christians. This statement is partially true. Hobbes, who was a devout Anglican, supported the divine right of kings and believed that the monarch's authority was derived from God. On the other hand, Locke, who was also a Christian, believed that government should be based on consent and did not accept the divine right of kings. Therefore, while both were Christians, they disagreed on the divine right of kings, and option 4 does not offer an accurate comparison.
Based on the analysis, none of the given options provide an accurate or comprehensive comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings. It is important to consult other reliable sources or texts that discuss their views in more detail to gain a better understanding of their respective positions.