5 of 55 of 5 Items Question What is the contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the Supreme Court?(1 point) Responses Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved. Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved. Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action. Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action. Judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power. Judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power. Judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches.
The correct response is: Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.
The contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the Supreme Court is as follows:
1. Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved.
2. Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.
3. Judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power.
4. Judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches.
So, the correct answer is: Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.