A minimum of five justices votes must be included of what type of opinion to be issued
Per curium opinion
Concurrent opinion
Dissenting opinion
Majority opinion
Concurring opinion
A minimum of five justices must vote in favor of a majority opinion to be issued.
To determine which type of opinion requires a minimum of five justices' votes, we need to understand the basics of Supreme Court decisions. When the Supreme Court decides a case, the justices may write different opinions explaining their reasoning and conclusions. The following are the four types of opinions typically issued by the Supreme Court:
1. Per curiam opinion: A decision rendered by the court as a whole, rather than by any specific justice. It is usually brief and unanimous, representing the court's collective view. Per curiam opinions are typically used for less significant cases. In this case, the minimum number of justices required is not specifically relevant.
2. Concurrent opinion: Also known as a concurring opinion, it is written by one or more justices who agree with the outcome of the case but for different reasons. These opinions can provide alternative legal reasoning or perspectives. The minimum number of justices required for a concurrent opinion is not significant.
3. Dissenting opinion: Written by justices who disagree with the majority's decision. Dissenting opinions express a different legal viewpoint and reasoning, often criticizing the majority's interpretation or conclusions. Similar to concurrent opinions, there is no minimum number of justices required for a dissenting opinion.
4. Majority opinion: The opinion issued by the majority of the justices who ultimately decide the case. In order for a majority opinion to be issued, a minimum of five justices must vote in favor of the same outcome and reasoning. It represents the court's official decision and sets legal precedent.
Therefore, the correct answer to your question is the "Majority opinion" that requires a minimum of five justices to vote in favor for it to be issued.