Which statement best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the
Roman Republic? (1 point)
The Athenlan Council of 500 was responsible for mililtary decisions whereas the Roman Republic did not have a specific
body designated for military actions
The consuls of the Roman Republic dictated the agenda of the Tribal Assembly whereas the Athenian democracy was
decided by the Council of 500
The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenlan ecclesia and
Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from ditterent territories within Athens.
○ The Athenian polis was ruled by a monarch whereas the Roman Republic used two consuls.
Search
9
N
R
O/C
NO
A
E
5
12
6
m
R
T
Y
U
D
The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.
The statement that best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic is:
"The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens."
This statement highlights the difference in the composition of the legislative bodies in both systems. In the Roman Republic, the senate was composed of wealthy patricians, while in Athens, the ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of citizens from different territories.
To determine which statement best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic, we can evaluate each statement and compare them.
The first statement suggests that the Athenian Council of 500 was responsible for military decisions, while the Roman Republic did not have a specific body designated for military actions. This reflects a difference in the organization and decision-making process regarding military matters between the two systems.
The second statement states that the consuls of the Roman Republic dictated the agenda of the Tribal Assembly, whereas the Athenian democracy was decided by the Council of 500. This highlights a difference in the roles and responsibilities of the decision-makers in each system.
The third statement points out that the senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates, while the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens. This emphasizes a distinction in the composition and representation of the decision-making bodies.
Finally, the fourth statement suggests that the Athenian polis was ruled by a monarch, whereas the Roman Republic used two consuls. This highlights a difference in the political leadership structure between the two systems.
Based on these statements, the most accurate explanation for the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic is the third statement. The composition and representation of the decision-making bodies in each system, as described in the statement, highlight a key contrast between them.