Which excerpt from Winona LaDuke’s "A Case for Waawaatesi” best appeals to readers’ logic?
Every year millions of birds die colliding with needlessly illuminated buildings and towers.
Nocturnal animals sleep during the day and are active at night. Light pollution radically alters their world by turning night into day.
It’s things like frogs, who make it their business to croak at night, particularly when mating. Artificial lights disrupt their mojo and that means less frogs and reduced populations.
Think of it this way, your ancestors navigated by the stars, and today most people won’t walk outside without a GPS. That’s a crazy loss of direction or skill at some level for sure.
The excerpt that best appeals to readers' logic is: "Every year millions of birds die colliding with needlessly illuminated buildings and towers." This statement presents a factual and logical argument about the negative impact of light pollution on bird populations.
The excerpt that best appeals to readers' logic is: "Every year millions of birds die colliding with needlessly illuminated buildings and towers." This statement presents a logical argument by providing a factual example of the negative consequences of light pollution.
The excerpt that best appeals to readers' logic is the second sentence:
Light pollution radically alters their world by turning night into day.
This sentence appeals to readers' logic because it presents a cause-and-effect relationship between light pollution and its impact on nocturnal animals. The logic behind this statement is that when the natural darkness of the night is disrupted by excessive artificial lighting, it disrupts the behavior and habitat of nocturnal animals. This logical argument can be understood by considering the basic biological cycles and needs of these animals, as well as the impact of environmental disruptions on any living creature. In this case, the relation between light pollution and its effect on nocturnal animals can be understood by using logical reasoning.