Why would the information on this chart be scrutinized for reliability?

Location: Literacy Rate: GDP per Capita (in current US$)
North Korea 100% 1,800
Taiwan 99% 46,800
Japan 99% 38,100
South Korea 98% 36,500
Hong Kong 94% 56,700
Indonesia 93% 11,100
India 71% 6,200

A. United States is not listed for comparison.

B. India has a much more developed economy than the numbers indicate.

C. North Korea's literacy rate is so high yet its GDP per capita is so low.

D. Because of their Literacy rate, Hong Kong cannot have a higher GDP per capita than Taiwan.

The information on this chart may be scrutinized for reliability because:

C. North Korea's literacy rate is so high yet its GDP per capita is so low. This discrepancy raises questions about the accuracy of the reported literacy rate or the reliability of the GDP per capita data.

The information on this chart may be scrutinized for reliability because of several reasons:

C. North Korea's literacy rate is so high yet its GDP per capita is so low. This seeming inconsistency raises questions about the accuracy of the data. It is unusual for a country with a high literacy rate to have such a low GDP per capita.

D. Because of their Literacy rate, Hong Kong cannot have a higher GDP per capita than Taiwan. This statement suggests a contradiction between the literacy rate and the GDP per capita of Hong Kong and Taiwan. It raises concerns about the accuracy or reliability of the data on either the literacy rate or the GDP per capita.

Additionally, one could argue that the absence of the United States in the chart for comparison (Option A) may raise questions about the completeness of the data. However, this does not necessarily directly relate to scrutinizing the reliability of the information on the chart.

Option B, suggesting that India has a more developed economy than the numbers indicate, could be a valid concern. However, it is not directly related to scrutinizing the reliability of the information on the chart as it focuses on the interpretation of the data rather than the accuracy of the data itself.

The information on this chart may be scrutinized for reliability for several reasons:

C. North Korea's literacy rate is so high yet its GDP per capita is so low.
This seems contradictory because typically higher literacy rates indicate a more educated population, which can lead to higher economic development. However, North Korea's low GDP per capita suggests that despite the high literacy rate, it may not accurately reflect the economic well-being of its citizens.

B. India has a much more developed economy than the numbers indicate.
Given India's large population and diverse economy, the low GDP per capita figure is surprising. It suggests that there may be other factors contributing to the overall economic development of the country that are not reflected solely by the GDP per capita, such as income distribution or other socioeconomic indicators.

D. Because of their literacy rate, Hong Kong cannot have a higher GDP per capita than Taiwan.
This statement assumes a direct correlation between literacy rate and GDP per capita. While literacy rate can play a role in economic development, it is not the sole determinant. Other factors such as innovation, trade, infrastructure, and governance also contribute to a nation's overall economic performance. Therefore, it is possible for Hong Kong to have a higher GDP per capita than Taiwan, even if Taiwan has a slightly higher literacy rate.

A. United States is not listed for comparison.
The absence of the United States from the chart might be concerning as it is often included as a benchmark for comparison due to its status as a developed country with a high literacy rate and a significant GDP per capita. Its omission may raise questions about the accuracy or completeness of the data presented.