Which of the following best describes why Mehmed II continued to trade with the Genoese despite their alliance with the Byzantines?(1 point)ResponsesMehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.Genoa was also a Muslim kingdom and its similar faith made it a natural ally.Genoa was also a Muslim kingdom and its similar faith made it a natural ally.The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them.The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them.They were already trading partners.They were already trading partners.

They were already trading partners.

The correct response is: Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.

To determine the best answer, let's analyze the given options:

1. Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.
2. Genoa was also a Muslim kingdom, and its similar faith made it a natural ally.
3. The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them.
4. They were already trading partners.

Out of these options, number 4 seems to best describe why Mehmed II continued to trade with the Genoese despite their alliance with the Byzantines. By stating that they were already trading partners, it indicates that maintaining trade with the Genoese was a pre-existing arrangement, and Mehmed II likely recognized the benefits of continuing this commercial relationship regardless of the political situation. Therefore, option 4 is the most accurate choice.