Which of the following best describes why Mehmed II continued to trade with the Genoese despite their alliance with the Byzantines? (1 point)
• They were already trading partners.
• Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood
• Genoa was also a Muslim kingdom and its similar faith made it a natural ally.
• The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them
The most accurate description for why Mehmed II continued to trade with the Genoese despite their alliance with the Byzantines is that they were already trading partners.
The best answer is: • They were already trading partners.
To determine the correct answer, let's examine each option one by one and analyze which one best describes why Mehmed II continued to trade with the Genoese despite their alliance with the Byzantines.
1. They were already trading partners: This option suggests that the pre-existing trade relationship between Mehmed II and the Genoese is the reason for their continued trade. However, this option does not specifically address the Genoese alliance with the Byzantines or Mehmed II's understanding of the importance of maintaining trade.
2. Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood: This option suggests that Mehmed II recognized the significance and advantages of continuing trade with the Genoese, similar to the Byzantines' understanding. This option implies that Mehmed II had a strategic mindset and pursued trade despite the Genoese alliance with the Byzantines.
3. Genoa was also a Muslim kingdom, and its similar faith made it a natural ally: This option suggests that Mehmed II continued to trade with the Genoese because they shared the same faith as Muslims. However, whether Genoa was a Muslim kingdom or not is not historically accurate, and there is no evidence to support this claim.
4. The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them: This option implies that the Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, leading to the Ottomans viewing them as trustworthy. However, there is no historical evidence to support this claim, and it is unlikely to be accurate.
Based on the analysis of the options above, the best answer would be option 2: Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood. This option aligns with reasoning based on Mehmed II's strategic thinking and the benefits of maintaining trade, which are supported by historical evidence.