Why would the information on this chart be scrutinized for reliability?
Location- Literacy Rate- GDP per Capita (in current US$)-
North Korea 100% 1,800
Taiwan 99% 46,800
Japan 99% 38,100
South Korea 98% 36,500
Hong Kong 94% 56,700
Indonesia 93% 11,100
India 71% 6,200
The United States is not listed for comparison.
India has a much more developed economy than the numbers indicate.
North Korea's literacy rate is so high yet its GDP per capita is so low.
Because of their Literacy rate, Hong Kong cannot have a higher GDP per Capita than Taiwan.
(pick one answer)
There could be several reasons why the information on this chart may be scrutinized for reliability:
1. Missing data or incomplete comparison: The fact that the United States is not listed for comparison raises questions about the completeness of the data. It is always important to have a comprehensive set of data to draw meaningful comparisons.
2. Discrepancy between literacy rate and GDP per capita: North Korea's high literacy rate does not match its low GDP per capita. This raises doubts about the accuracy or validity of the data for North Korea. It is unusual for a country with high literacy rates to have such a low GDP per capita.
3. Inconsistent relationships: The chart suggests that Hong Kong, with a literacy rate of 94%, has a higher GDP per capita than Taiwan, with a 99% literacy rate. This contradicts the general expectation that higher literacy rates are associated with higher GDP per capita. This inconsistency raises concerns about the reliability of the data for these regions.
Overall, the discrepancies, missing data, and inconsistent relationships within the chart suggest that the information may not be entirely reliable or accurate.
The information on this chart may be scrutinized for reliability due to several reasons:
1. The absence of the United States for comparison: The chart is missing one of the most significant and influential economies in the world, the United States. This omission raises questions about the completeness and accuracy of the data. Without the inclusion of a major benchmark country, it becomes difficult to assess the relative standing of the listed countries accurately.
2. Discrepancy between literacy rate and GDP per capita: The example of North Korea stands out as an inconsistency. North Korea is shown to have a 100% literacy rate, which is unusually high. However, its GDP per capita is comparatively low, at $1,800. This contradiction prompts skepticism and calls for examination to verify the accuracy of the literacy rate or assess other factors influencing the low GDP per capita.
3. Underestimation of India's economy: The chart suggests that India's literacy rate is 71%, and its GDP per capita is $6,200. However, it states that India has a more developed economy than the numbers indicate. This statement implies that the chart's data might underestimate India's economic progress, suggesting a potential lack of reliability in the provided figures.
4. Inconsistency between literacy rate and GDP per capita: The chart seems to suggest that Hong Kong has a higher GDP per capita than Taiwan, despite having a slightly lower literacy rate (94% compared to Taiwan's 99%). This raises doubts about the relationship between literacy rate and GDP per capita and the accuracy of the data presented.
Depending on the context of the question, any of these reasons could be valid for scrutinizing the chart's reliability.
The information on this chart may be scrutinized for reliability for several reasons:
1. The absence of the United States for comparison raises concerns about the completeness and accuracy of the data. It is important to have a comprehensive set of data to make meaningful comparisons.
2. The significant disparity between literacy rates and GDP per capita in North Korea raises questions about the reliability and accuracy of the reported data. The high literacy rate suggests a highly educated population, but the low GDP per capita contradicts this assumption. This discrepancy prompts further scrutiny and analysis.
3. The seemingly inconsistent relationship between literacy rates and GDP per capita in different countries, such as Hong Kong and Taiwan, challenges the credibility of the data. The chart suggests that despite having a lower literacy rate, Hong Kong has a higher GDP per capita compared to Taiwan. This contradiction may lead to doubts about the accuracy of the reported data.
In conclusion, the reliability of the information on this chart may be called into question due to the absence of certain countries, the inconsistencies between literacy rates and GDP per capita, and the unexpected relationships between different measures.