Analyze the provisions guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Which provision invalidated the “separate but equal doctrine” of Plessy v. Ferguson?(1 point)
A. Title II: Public Accommodations
B. Title IV: Public Schools
C. Title VI: Government Agencies
D. Title III: Public Property
The provision that invalidated the "separate but equal doctrine" of Plessy v. Ferguson is A. Title II: Public Accommodations.
To analyze the provisions guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and determine which provision invalidated the "separate but equal doctrine" of Plessy v. Ferguson, we need to review the different titles of the act.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 consisted of eleven titles, each addressing different aspects of discrimination. However, the provision that specifically invalidated the "separate but equal doctrine" is found in Title II: Public Accommodations.
Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in places of public accommodation, such as hotels, restaurants, theaters, and other public facilities. This provision explicitly states that any establishment that provides goods or services to the public is prohibited from denying access, segregating, or discriminating against individuals based on their race, color, religion, or national origin.
The “separate but equal doctrine” of Plessy v. Ferguson, a Supreme Court decision from 1896, allowed racially segregated public facilities as long as they were deemed "equal" in quality. However, Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 directly invalidated this doctrine by making racial discrimination in public accommodations illegal.
Therefore, the provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that invalidated the "separate but equal doctrine" of Plessy v. Ferguson is A. Title II: Public Accommodations.