Which of the following best describes why Mehmed II continued to trade with the Genoese despite their alliance with the Byzantines?(1 point)
The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them.
Genoa was also a Muslim kingdom and its similar faith made it a natural ally
Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.
They were already trading partners
Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.
The correct answer is:
Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.
To determine which of the options best describes why Mehmed II continued to trade with the Genoese despite their alliance with the Byzantines, we can analyze each option and assess its likelihood.
1. The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them.
This option assumes that the Ottomans would trust the Genoese because they betrayed the Byzantines. However, there is no evidence provided to suggest that betrayal would automatically result in trust.
2. Genoa was also a Muslim kingdom, and its similar faith made it a natural ally.
This option suggests that Mehmed II may have continued to trade with the Genoese because of their shared religion. However, it is important to note that religion alone cannot be the sole reason for continuing trade relations.
3. Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.
This option states that Mehmed II recognized the significance and advantages of continuing trade with the Genoese, similar to what the Byzantines understood. This explanation seems plausible as it acknowledges the economic benefits of trade and the pragmatic approach taken by both Byzantines and Ottomans.
4. They were already trading partners.
This option suggests that the Ottomans continued to trade with the Genoese simply because they were already trading partners. While this may be a possible factor, it does not address why Mehmed II would continue trading despite the Genoese's alliance with the Byzantines.
Considering the options provided, "Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood" appears to be the best choice. This explanation acknowledges the mutual recognition of the economic advantages of trade and aligns with the pragmatic nature of political and economic relationships during that time period. To solidify this conclusion, one could consult historical texts, primary sources, or scholarly works that delve into the reasons for the Ottoman Empire's trade decisions with the Genoese.