Why would the information on this chart be scrutinized for reliability
Location: Literacy rate. GDP per capital
North Korea: 100%. 1,800
Taiwan: 99%. 46,800
Japan: 99%. 38,100
South Korea: 98%. 36,500
Hong Kong: 94%. 56,700
Indonesia: 93%. 11,100
India: 71%. 6,200
Responses:
A. The United States is not listed for comparison.
B. India has much more developed economy than the numbers indicate.
C. Literacy is so high yet it’s GDP per capita is so low
D. Because of their literacy rate, Hong Kong cannot have a higher GDP per capita than Taiwan.
There could be several reasons why the information on this chart may be scrutinized for reliability:
C. Literacy is so high, yet its GDP per capita is so low: The high literacy rate in a country like India (71%) compared to its relatively low GDP per capita ($6,200) may raise questions about the accuracy of the data. Typically, higher literacy rates are associated with higher economic development and higher GDP per capita. Hence, the discrepancy between these two variables for India may prompt scrutiny.
D. Because of their literacy rate, Hong Kong cannot have a higher GDP per capita than Taiwan: As the statement suggests, the high literacy rate in Hong Kong (94%) compared to Taiwan (99%) seems contradictory to the higher GDP per capita of Hong Kong ($56,700) compared to Taiwan ($46,800). This discrepancy may lead to questioning the reliability of the data provided.
In summary, the information on this chart may be scrutinized for its reliability due to the discrepancy between literacy rates and GDP per capita in certain countries (such as India), as well as the potential contradiction between high literacy rates and lower GDP per capita in other countries (such as Hong Kong vs. Taiwan).
The information on this chart might be scrutinized for reliability for several reasons:
A. The United States is not listed for comparison: One reason why the information might be questioned is the absence of the United States, which is a major global economic power. To have a comprehensive understanding of literacy rates and GDP per capita, it is important to compare the data with other significant countries to put it into context. The absence of such a comparison raises doubts about the reliability of the chart.
B. India has a much more developed economy than the numbers indicate: Another reason the information could be scrutinized is if it suggests that India, with a relatively low GDP per capita, has a more developed economy than what is commonly understood. A significant difference between India's GDP per capita and its neighboring countries with higher rates raises questions about the accuracy of the data.
C. Literacy is high, yet GDP per capita is low: The chart also shows high literacy rates in several countries (North Korea, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea), but some of these countries have a lower GDP per capita compared to countries with lower literacy rates (Hong Kong, Indonesia). This contradiction, where high literacy rates do not necessarily correspond to high GDP per capita, might lead to skepticism regarding the accuracy of the information.
D. Hong Kong's GDP per capita cannot be higher than Taiwan's due to their literacy rates: The chart indicates that Hong Kong, with a 94% literacy rate, has a higher GDP per capita than Taiwan, with a 99% literacy rate. This seems counterintuitive, as generally higher literacy rates are associated with higher economic development. This contradiction raises doubts about the reliability of the data presented in the chart.
In summary, the information on this chart may be scrutinized for reliability due to the absence of important comparisons, discrepancies between literacy rates and GDP per capita, and contradictions between literacy rates and the corresponding economic development. To ensure the accuracy of the information, it is important to cross-reference this chart with data from other reliable sources.
The information on this chart may be scrutinized for reliability for multiple reasons. One reason is the lack of certain countries listed for comparison, such as the United States. This omission could raise questions about the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the data.
Another reason for scrutiny could be the apparent inconsistency between literacy rates and GDP per capita. For example, India has a relatively low GDP per capita of 6,200, despite having a literacy rate of 71%. This raises concerns about the accuracy of the reported GDP figures and suggests that India's economy might be more developed than the numbers indicate.
Additionally, there seems to be a discrepancy between literacy rates and GDP per capita for Hong Kong and Taiwan. Hong Kong has a higher literacy rate of 94% compared to Taiwan's rate of 99%, yet Hong Kong's GDP per capita (56,700) is significantly higher than Taiwan's (46,800). This inconsistency could lead to questions regarding the relationship between literacy rates and economic development.
In summary, the information on this chart may be scrutinized for reliability due to the absence of certain countries for comparison, discrepancies between literacy rates and GDP per capita figures, and inconsistencies in the relationship between literacy rates and economic development.