Summarize the conflicts and compromises of the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise
short information
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a resolution to the conflict between small and large states regarding representation in the United States Congress. The smaller states wanted equal representation, while the larger states wanted representation based on their population. This compromise proposed a bicameral legislature: the House of Representatives would have representation based on population, while the Senate would have equal representation with two senators per state.
The Three-Fifths Compromise addressed the issue of how enslaved individuals would be counted for the purpose of representation and taxation. Southern states wanted enslaved individuals to be counted as part of their population to increase their representation in Congress, while Northern states opposed this since enslaved individuals had no voting rights. The compromise settled on counting each enslaved individual as three-fifths of a person for both representation and taxation purposes.
These compromises were crucial in establishing the foundation of the United States government and ensuring the participation of both small and large states in the legislative process. However, they also perpetuated the institution of slavery and the unfair treatment of enslaved individuals.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a pivotal agreement reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in the United States. It resolved the deadlock between the large states and small states regarding representation in the legislative branch. The main conflicts and compromises are:
1) Representation in Congress: The larger states wanted representation based on population, while the smaller states favored equal representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives being based on population and the Senate having equal representation for all states.
2) Electoral College: There was disagreement over the method of electing the President. The compromise established the Electoral College system, where voters in each state would choose electors who would then vote for the President.
On the other hand, the Three-Fifths Compromise addressed the issue of how enslaved individuals should be counted for both taxation and representation purposes. The main conflicts and compromises are:
1) Slavery and Representation: Southern states wanted enslaved individuals to be counted as part of their population to gain more representation in Congress. Northern states objected because enslaved individuals were not granted the rights of citizens. The Three-Fifths Compromise settled on counting each enslaved individual as three-fifths of a person for both taxation and representation.
2) Taxation and Slavery: Southern states wanted enslaved individuals to be counted as part of the population for taxation purposes to reduce their tax burden. Northern states opposed this idea. The Three-Fifths Compromise agreed to count three-fifths of the enslaved population for both representation and taxation.
These compromises were crucial in shaping the structure of the United States government and constitution, but they also perpetuated the problems related to slavery.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise were two important agreements reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in the United States.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, addressed the issue of representation in the newly formed Congress. The conflict arose between the larger states, such as Virginia and Pennsylvania, which wanted representation to be based on population, and the smaller states, like Connecticut and New Jersey, which preferred equal representation for all states.
To resolve this conflict, the Great Compromise proposed a bicameral legislature - a Congress consisting of two chambers. In the House of Representatives, representation would be based on population, giving the larger states the advantage they sought. On the other hand, in the Senate, each state would have equal representation, providing the smaller states with a voice and preventing them from being overwhelmed by the larger states.
The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, dealt with the issue of how enslaved individuals would be counted in terms of representation and taxation. The conflict emerged between the Northern states, where slavery was less prevalent, and the Southern states, which had a large enslaved population.
The compromise stated that enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of representation and taxation. This compromise allowed the Southern states to gain greater representation in the House of Representatives and, consequently, increased political power. However, it also perpetuated the dehumanization of enslaved individuals and further entrenched slavery in the American political system.
In summary, the Great Compromise addressed the conflict of representation between larger and smaller states by establishing a two-chambered Congress, while the Three-Fifths Compromise dealt with the contentious issue of how to count enslaved individuals for both representation and taxation purposes.