How did French and Australian assimilationist policies differ from each other?(1 point)

France and Australia used the same assimilationist policies in every instance.
France created schools to assimilate willing Indigenous peoples, while Australia took children to forcibly assimilate Indigenous
peoples.
France promoted the idea of scientific racism, while Australia rejected it in favor of social Darwinism.
Australia promoted the use of scientific racism when determining who would receive rights, while France used a policy of
intermarriage.

Australia took children to forcibly assimilate Indigenous peoples, while France created schools to assimilate willing Indigenous peoples.

To understand how French and Australian assimilationist policies differed from each other, we need to analyze the choices provided and identify the most accurate statement. A good approach in this case is to break down each option:

Option 1: France and Australia used the same assimilationist policies in every instance.
This option states that France and Australia followed identical assimilationist policies in all cases, which is not historically accurate. Therefore, this statement can be ruled out as incorrect.

Option 2: France created schools to assimilate willing Indigenous peoples, while Australia took children to forcibly assimilate Indigenous peoples.
This option suggests that France had a policy of assimilating willing Indigenous peoples through schools, whereas Australia forcibly assimilated Indigenous peoples by taking their children. This statement accurately represents the differences in assimilationist policies between the two countries. Children were indeed taken from Indigenous communities in Australia as part of assimilation efforts, such as the Stolen Generations, whereas France focused more on voluntary assimilation through education.

Option 3: France promoted the idea of scientific racism, while Australia rejected it in favor of social Darwinism.
This option proposes that France embraced the concept of scientific racism, while Australia favored social Darwinism. However, both scientific racism and social Darwinism were influential ideologies in the assimilation policies of both countries. Therefore, this statement is not entirely accurate.

Option 4: Australia promoted the use of scientific racism when determining who would receive rights, while France used a policy of intermarriage.
This option suggests that Australia relied on scientific racism to determine who would receive rights, whereas France used a policy of intermarriage. While it is true that Australia employed theories of scientific racism in its assimilation policies, France did not strictly use a policy of intermarriage. Although intermarriage was encouraged in certain cases, it was not the sole approach in France.

Based on the information provided, option 2 is the most accurate statement. France indeed focused on assimilation through schools for willing Indigenous individuals, while Australia forcibly assimilated Indigenous peoples by taking children from their communities.

The correct answer is:

Australia took children to forcibly assimilate Indigenous peoples, while France created schools to assimilate willing Indigenous peoples.