how did the french and australian assimilationist policies differ from each other?
France and Austrilia used the same assimilationist policies in every instance
austrlia promoted the use of scientific racism when determining who would recieve rihts while france used a policu of intermarriage
france promoted the idea of scientific racism whole austrilia rejected it in favor of social darwism
France created schools to assimale willing indigenous peoples while austrilia took children to forcib;y assimalte indigeous peoples
The French and Australian assimilationist policies differed from each other in several ways:
1. Approach towards indigenous peoples: France mainly focused on intermarriage and encouraging indigenous people to adopt French customs and language. Australia, on the other hand, forcibly removed indigenous children from their families to assimilate them into white society, a policy known as the Stolen Generations.
2. Application of scientific racism: While Australia did promote the use of scientific racism to determine who would receive rights and benefits, such as the "White Australia" policy, France did not explicitly adopt this approach. France's assimilationist policies were more focused on cultural assimilation through intermarriage.
3. Attitude towards indigenous languages and culture: France had a more tolerant approach towards indigenous languages and culture, recognizing them as part of French national heritage. In contrast, Australia viewed indigenous languages and customs as inferior and actively discouraged their practice.
4. Assimilation methods: France established schools and institutions to assimilate indigenous peoples voluntarily, providing them with education and opportunities to adopt French culture. Australia, on the other hand, forcibly removed indigenous children from their families and placed them in institutions where they were forbidden to practice their indigenous traditions and forced to adopt European customs.
Overall, while both France and Australia pursued assimilationist policies towards indigenous peoples, the methods and approaches they employed differed significantly.
The French and Australian assimilationist policies differed from each other in several ways:
1. France promoted intermarriage as a means of assimilation: In France, the government encouraged intermarriage between French settlers and indigenous peoples as a way to assimilate them into French society.
2. Australia used scientific racism to determine rights: Australia embraced the idea of scientific racism, which involved classifying indigenous peoples based on perceived racial hierarchy. This approach was used to determine who would receive certain rights and privileges.
3. France rejected scientific racism in favor of social Darwinism: In contrast to Australia, France rejected the concept of scientific racism and instead adopted a policy of social Darwinism. This approach viewed indigenous peoples as being at a lower stage of societal evolution and aimed to "civilize" them through assimilation.
4. Differences in education policies: France established schools to assimilate willing indigenous peoples into French culture and language. In contrast, Australia employed the controversial practice of forcibly removing indigenous children from their families and placing them in institutions, known as the "Stolen Generations," to assimilate them into mainstream Australian society.
Overall, while both France and Australia had assimilationist policies, they differed in their methods and approaches to achieving assimilation.
To understand the differences between French and Australian assimilationist policies, let's break it down step by step:
1. Scope of Assimilation:
Both France and Australia implemented assimilationist policies, but they differed in their scope. Australia's assimilation policy aimed to assimilate the entire indigenous population, whereas France primarily focused on assimilating willing indigenous individuals.
2. Approach to Rights:
Australia promoted the use of scientific racism in determining who would receive rights. This means that they used theories of racial superiority and inferiority to determine the allocation of rights. In contrast, France implemented a policy of intermarriage, encouraging French settlers to marry indigenous individuals to facilitate assimilation.
3. Ideological Foundation:
France's assimilationist policies were influenced by the concept of scientific racism, which posited that certain races were biologically superior to others. Australia, on the other hand, rejected scientific racism in favor of social Darwinism. Social Darwinism is a theory that suggests that human societies evolve and progress through competition and natural selection.
4. Means of Assimilation:
In terms of the means of assimilation, France established schools to assimilate indigenous peoples who willingly chose to participate in the process. Australia, however, took a more forceful approach and implemented policies that involved the removal of indigenous children from their families, commonly known as the Stolen Generations, in an attempt to forcibly assimilate them into Western society.
In summary, the French and Australian assimilationist policies differed in terms of their scope, approach to rights, ideological foundation, and means of assimilation. Understanding these differences provides insights into the contrasting approaches taken by these two countries towards indigenous assimilation.