Which two parts of the passage most clearly support the implied claim that Daylight Saving Time will likely change in the future?
1. paragraph 1 where the text defines Daylight Saving Time and names the legislative body with an interest in it
2. paragraph 1 where the text explains that Daylight Saving
Time was adopted and set in statute in 1918
3. paragraph 2 where the text reveals that Congress can ask other agencies to research Daylight Saving Time
4. paragraph 2 where the text provides evidence and results of studies done on Daylight Saving Time
5. paragraph 3 where the text states that the length of the Daylight Saving Time period is controlled by Congress
6. paragraph 3 where the text details new legislation proposed by states since 2015 for Daylight Saving Time
Option 3 and option 6 most clearly support the implied claim that Daylight Saving Time will likely change in the future. Option 3 states that Congress can ask other agencies to research Daylight Saving Time, suggesting that there is an interest in gathering more information about it. Option 6 mentions new legislation proposed by states since 2015, indicating that there is ongoing discussion and potential for change in the future.
To determine which two parts of the passage most clearly support the implied claim that Daylight Saving Time will likely change in the future, we need to assess the information provided in the passage.
1. Paragraph 1, which defines Daylight Saving Time and mentions the legislative body involved, does not inherently suggest that it will change in the future. It simply provides background information.
2. Paragraph 1, which explains that Daylight Saving Time was adopted and set in statute in 1918, does not explicitly indicate future changes.
3. Paragraph 2 reveals that Congress can request other agencies to conduct research on Daylight Saving Time. While this indicates Congress has an interest in gathering information, it does not directly support the claim of future change.
4. In paragraph 2, the text mentions evidence and results of studies done on Daylight Saving Time. Although this information may be relevant to potential future changes, it still does not directly support the claim.
5. Paragraph 3 states that the length of the Daylight Saving Time period is controlled by Congress. This information suggests that Congress has the power to modify the length, supporting the claim that it could change in the future.
6. Paragraph 3 provides details about new legislation proposed by states since 2015 for Daylight Saving Time. This suggests that states are actively considering changes to Daylight Saving Time, further supporting the claim of potential future changes.
Based on the analysis, paragraphs 5 and 6 most clearly support the implied claim that Daylight Saving Time will likely change in the future.
The two parts of the passage that most clearly support the implied claim that Daylight Saving Time will likely change in the future are:
3. paragraph 2 where the text reveals that Congress can ask other agencies to research Daylight Saving Time
6. paragraph 3 where the text details new legislation proposed by states since 2015 for Daylight Saving Time