Why might an attorney utilize peremptory challenges?(1 point)

Responses

to remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community
to remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community

to remove a potential juror based on race
to remove a potential juror based on race

to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias
to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias

to remove a potential juror based on gender

to remove a potential juror based on gender

to remove a potential juror based on gender

An attorney might utilize peremptory challenges in a jury selection process for a few reasons:

1. To remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community: This can be done if the attorney believes that a juror from a particular community might have a bias or prejudice that could influence their decision in the case.

2. To remove a potential juror based on race: While it is generally considered unethical and unconstitutional to dismiss a juror solely based on their race, unfortunately, attorneys have historically used peremptory challenges to strike potential jurors of certain races. However, it is important to note that this practice has been strongly discouraged by courts and is subject to constitutional limitations.

3. To remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias: An attorney may choose to use a peremptory challenge if they believe that a potential juror has shown signs of prejudice or bias that could impact their ability to impartially evaluate the evidence and make a fair decision.

4. To remove a potential juror based on gender: This reason is no longer valid as peremptory challenges based on gender are generally not allowed, as it goes against the principle of equal protection under the law.

It's essential to remember that these reasons may vary depending on jurisdiction and legal rules. Also, it's important to consult legal professionals or refer to relevant legal resources to understand the specific rules and guidelines regarding peremptory challenges in a given jurisdiction.