Analyze the provisions guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Which provision invalidated the “separate but equal doctrine” of Plessy v. Ferguson?(1 point)
Responses
Title IV: Public Schools
Title IV: Public Schools
Title III: Public Property
Title III: Public Property
Title VI: Government Agencies
Title VI: Government Agencies
Title II: Public Accommodatio
Title II: Public Accommodations
The provision that invalidated the "separate but equal doctrine" of Plessy v. Ferguson is Title II: Public Accommodations. This provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in public accommodations, which includes hotels, restaurants, theaters, and other public facilities. It states that all individuals should have equal access to these facilities regardless of their race, color, religion, or national origin. This provision effectively ended the practice of segregation in public places.
The provision that invalidated the "separate but equal doctrine" of Plessy v. Ferguson is Title II: Public Accommodations. To arrive at this answer, let's break down the question and understand the context.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a landmark piece of legislation that aimed to combat discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It was enacted to ensure equal treatment and opportunities for all individuals.
In the context of the question, the "separate but equal doctrine" refers to the legal principle established by the Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896. This doctrine allowed for racial segregation as long as the separate facilities were deemed equal in quality, typically leading to racially segregated public spaces and institutions.
Now, let's examine the response options provided:
- Title IV: Public Schools: This title addressed desegregation in public schools, but it did not directly invalidate the "separate but equal doctrine."
- Title III: Public Property: This title focused on equality in public facilities and accommodations, but it also did not directly invalidate the "separate but equal doctrine."
- Title VI: Government Agencies: This title prohibited discrimination in federally funded programs and activities, but it did not directly invalidate the "separate but equal doctrine."
- Title II: Public Accommodations: This title specifically addressed discrimination in accessing public accommodations, including hotels, restaurants, and other establishments open to the public. It directly invalidated the "separate but equal doctrine" by prohibiting segregation in these public spaces.
Therefore, the correct answer is Title II: Public Accommodations.