Which of the following best analyzes the ruling Plessy v.
Ferguson had on individual freedoms and equal protections?
(1 point)
Plessy v. Ferguson established the separate but equal
doctrine that segregated Black Americans in public spaces.
Plessy v. Ferguson applied the separate but equal doctrine
only to public transportation across the U.S.
Plessy v. Ferguson established segregation in public
transportation based on the constitutionality of the
Louisiana Separate Car Act.
Plessy v. Ferguson ended segregation between White and
Black Americans with the separate but equal doctrine.
The correct answer is:
Plessy v. Ferguson established segregation in public transportation based on the constitutionality of the Louisiana Separate Car Act.
The correct answer is:
Plessy v. Ferguson established segregation in public transportation based on the constitutionality of the Louisiana Separate Car Act.
To determine which option best analyzes the ruling of Plessy v. Ferguson on individual freedoms and equal protections, we need to understand the case and its impact.
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark Supreme Court case in 1896 that involved a challenge to a Louisiana law, the Separate Car Act, which required separate railway cars for black and white citizens. The plaintiff, Homer Plessy, who was 1/8th black and 7/8th white, intentionally violated the law by sitting in a white-only railway car and was subsequently arrested.
The Supreme Court's ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson established the "separate but equal" doctrine, which stated that racial segregation was constitutional as long as the separate facilities were equal in quality. This ruling had a significant impact on individual freedoms and equal protections.
Now, let's analyze the provided options:
1. Plessy v. Ferguson established the separate but equal doctrine that segregated Black Americans in public spaces.
This option accurately states that Plessy v. Ferguson established the "separate but equal" doctrine, which led to the segregation of black Americans in public spaces. It correctly highlights the impact on individual freedoms and equal protections.
2. Plessy v. Ferguson applied the separate but equal doctrine only to public transportation across the U.S.
This option incorrectly suggests that Plessy v. Ferguson only applied the "separate but equal" doctrine to public transportation. The ruling had a broader impact on segregation in other public spaces as well.
3. Plessy v. Ferguson established segregation in public transportation based on the constitutionality of the Louisiana Separate Car Act.
This option accurately states that Plessy v. Ferguson established segregation in public transportation based on the constitutionality of the Louisiana Separate Car Act. It correctly acknowledges the specific context of the ruling.
4. Plessy v. Ferguson ended segregation between White and Black Americans with the separate but equal doctrine.
This option incorrectly suggests that Plessy v. Ferguson ended segregation between white and black Americans. In fact, the ruling upheld segregation based on the "separate but equal" doctrine.
Based on the analysis, the most accurate option that best analyzes the ruling of Plessy v. Ferguson on individual freedoms and equal protections is option 1:
Plessy v. Ferguson established the separate but equal doctrine that segregated Black Americans in public spaces.