WHich statement best explains the differences between the demoncracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic?
The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territones within Athens
The consuls of the Roman Republic dictated the agenda of the Tribal Assembly whereas the Athenian democracy was decided by the Council of 500.
The Athenian polis was ruled by a monarch whereas the Roman Republic used two consuls
The Athenian Council of 500 was responsible for military decisions whereas the Roman Republic did not have a specific body designated for military actions.
The statement that best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic is:
The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates, whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.
The statement that best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic is:
"The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens."
The statement that best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic is: "The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territones within Athens."
To understand this, let's break it down.
The democracy of the Athenian polis (city-state) had two main governing bodies: the ecclesia and the Council of 500. The ecclesia was an assembly composed of all adult male citizens, who had the power to vote on major decisions and legislation. On the other hand, the Council of 500 was responsible for daily administration and proposing legislation. Its members were selected by lot (randomly) from different territories within Athens, ensuring a broad representation of citizens.
In the Roman Republic, the main governing body was the senate. However, the composition of the senate was quite different from the Athenian Council of 500. The Roman senate was made up of wealthy patrician magistrates. These patricians were typically from the aristocratic class, with significant wealth and influence. They held considerable power in decision-making and helped shape the agenda of the Tribal Assembly.
So, the key difference is that in the Athenian democracy, citizens were selected by lot to serve in the Council of 500, whereas in the Roman Republic, the senate was composed of wealthy patricians.
The other statements mentioned in the question are not accurate explanations of the differences between Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic's structure.