one business charges $22 per t-shirt that is custom made.
another business charges $16 per t-shirt plus a $15 set up fee for custom made t-shirts.
how would you transform the first graph to make it become a non proportional graph with the same y-intercept as the second graph?
A. right 4
B. down 15
C. left 15
D. down 4
E. up 4
F. up 15
To transform the first graph to make it become a non-proportional graph with the same y-intercept as the second graph, we need to add the constant fee of $15 to the cost of the t-shirt in the first graph.
Since the constant fee is added to the cost and does not affect the slope of the graph, the correct transformation is to move the graph up by $15.
Therefore, the correct answer is F. up 15.
To transform the first graph to make it become a non-proportional graph with the same y-intercept as the second graph, we need to make the y-intercepts of both graphs the same.
The second graph has a y-intercept of $15, which means that when the quantity is zero, the cost is $15.
The first graph, on the other hand, has a y-intercept of $0, which means that when the quantity is zero, the cost is also zero.
To make the y-intercepts the same, we need to shift the first graph downwards by $15. Therefore, the correct answer is:
B. Down 15
To transform the first graph into a non-proportional graph with the same y-intercept as the second graph, you need to make the y-values change at a different rate for different x-values. This can be done by adding or subtracting values to the y-values.
In this case, the y-intercept is the initial cost, which is $15 for the second graph. To make the first graph have the same y-intercept, you need to subtract $15 from all the y-values.
So, the correct transformation would be option D, which says "down 4". However, it seems there might be a typo in the provided options, as subtracting $4 from the y-values would not give the same y-intercept as the second graph. Therefore, the correct option may not be listed among the options provided.