6. One business charges $22 per t-shirt that is custom made. %0D%0A%0D%0AAnother business charges $16 per t-shirt plus a $15 set up fee for custom made t-shirts.%0D%0A%0D%0AHow would you transform the first graph to make it become a non proportional graph with the same y-intercept as the second graph?%0D%0A%0D%0A(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0ALeft 15%0D%0ALeft 15%0D%0A%0D%0AUp 4%0D%0AUp 4%0D%0A%0D%0AUp 15%0D%0AUp 15%0D%0A%0D%0ADown 4%0D%0ADown 4%0D%0A%0D%0ARight 4%0D%0ARight 4%0D%0A%0D%0ADown 15

To transform the first graph to become a non-proportional graph with the same y-intercept as the second graph, you would add a constant value to the equation.

In this case, the second graph has a y-intercept of $15 (the set-up fee), so you would need to add $15 to the equation of the first graph.

The equation of the first graph is y = 22x, where x represents the number of t-shirts. To add the $15 set-up fee, the equation of the transformed graph would be y = 22x + 15.

SHOW MW A GRAPH

I apologize, but as a text-based AI model, I am unable to directly show or generate visual content like graphs. However, you can plot the graph yourself using a graphing tool or software. Here are the steps to plot the transformed equation:

1. Set up a coordinate plane with the x-axis representing the number of t-shirts and the y-axis representing the cost.
2. For the first graph, plot points using the equation y = 22x. For example, if you have x = 0, the cost would be y = 0. If you have x = 1, the cost would be y = 22. Connect these points to form a straight line.
3. For the transformed graph, plot points using the equation y = 22x + 15. Add 15 to the y-values of the first graph's points. Connect these points to form a new line parallel to the original line but shifted up by 15 units.

Please note that both lines are linear and have the same slope, but the transformed graph has a y-intercept that is 15 units higher than the original graph.

What are the coordinates on the graph?

To provide the coordinates on the graph, I need a specific range of values for the x-axis. Could you please provide the range or specific values you would like to know the coordinates for?

To transform the first graph to become a non-proportional graph with the same y-intercept as the second graph, you would make the following transformations:

1. Left 15: This means you would shift the graph 15 units to the left.
2. Up 4: This means you would shift the graph 4 units up.
3. Up 15: This means you would shift the graph 15 units up.
4. Down 4: This means you would shift the graph 4 units down.
5. Right 4: This means you would shift the graph 4 units to the right.
6. Down 15: This means you would shift the graph 15 units down.

By applying these transformations to the first graph, you would achieve a non-proportional graph with the same y-intercept as the second graph.

To transform the first graph to become a non-proportional graph with the same y-intercept as the second graph, you would need to make the following steps:

1. Start with the equation of the first graph, which represents the first business charging $22 per t-shirt. The equation is: y = 22x, where y is the total cost and x is the number of t-shirts.

2. Add a constant value to the equation to represent the set-up fee charged by the second business. The equation becomes: y = 22x + 15, where y is the total cost and x is the number of t-shirts.

3. Now, to make the two graphs non-proportional, we need to change the relationship between x and y. Since the first graph is a proportional graph, we need to make adjustments to the x-values or the y-values to break the proportionality.

4. One way to transform the first graph is by increasing or decreasing the x-values by a fixed amount for various points. However, since we are aiming to have the same y-intercept as the second graph, this approach won't work.

5. Another way to transform the first graph is by increasing or decreasing the y-values by a fixed amount for various points. This will change the slope of the graph and make it non-proportional while keeping the y-intercept the same.

To achieve this transformation, we can follow these steps for each point on the first graph:

- Move left or right by a fixed amount (in this case, the point is not moving left or right).
- Move up or down by a fixed amount (in this case, move down by 15).

So for each point, you would move down by 15 units. This will create a non-proportional graph with the same y-intercept as the second graph.