What was the outcome of the Marbury v. Madison case?(1 point)
Responses
Senate now has to confirm presidential appointments
Senate now has to confirm presidential appointments
President is allowed freedom to make appointments
President is allowed freedom to make appointments
Judicial branch has judicial review powers
Judicial branch has judicial review powers
Legislature is now allowed to make laws
Judicial branch has judicial review powers
The outcome of the Marbury v. Madison case was that the judicial branch gained the power of judicial review.
The correct answer is: Judicial branch has judicial review powers.
To arrive at this conclusion, we need to understand the context and details of the Marbury v. Madison case. The Marbury v. Madison case was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in 1803. The case involved the appointment of William Marbury as a justice of the peace by outgoing President John Adams. However, his appointment was not formally delivered by the time President Thomas Jefferson took office.
Marbury filed a writ of mandamus, asking the Supreme Court to order Secretary of State James Madison to deliver the appointment. Chief Justice John Marshall, who presided over the case, ruled that Marbury was entitled to the appointment, but the court did not have the authority to enforce it. In his opinion, Chief Justice Marshall stated that the Judiciary Act of 1789 (which was the basis for Marbury's claim) was unconstitutional because it expanded the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court beyond what was outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
This ruling established the principle of judicial review, which is the power of the judiciary to declare a law or government action unconstitutional. It established the Supreme Court as an equal branch of government with the power to interpret the Constitution and review the actions of the other branches. Therefore, the outcome of the Marbury v. Madison case was that the judicial branch gained the power of judicial review.