A student claims that dominant traits are always the most common traits. Is this true? Why or why not?(1 point)
Responses
Yes, dominant traits are called dominant because they are the most common.
Yes, dominant traits are called dominant because they are the most common.
No, dominant traits only show up if they are inherited; how common they are is not influenced by this.
No, dominant traits only show up if they are inherited; how common they are is not influenced by this.
Yes, dominant traits became more common over time as they are passed down from generation to generation; recessive alleles continue to become less common over time.
Yes, dominant traits became more common over time as they are passed down from generation to generation; recessive alleles continue to become less common over time.
No, dominant traits in general tend to be less common in the population and continue to persist only because they are dominant over more common recessive alleles.
No, dominant traits in general tend to be less common in the population and continue to persist only because they are dominant over more common recessive allele
pick an answer
No, dominant traits in general tend to be less common in the population and continue to persist only because they are dominant over more common recessive alleles.
No, dominant traits in general tend to be less common in the population and continue to persist only because they are dominant over more common recessive alleles.
No, dominant traits in general tend to be less common in the population and continue to persist only because they are dominant over more common recessive alleles.
To answer this question, we need to understand the concepts of dominant and recessive traits in genetics. In simple terms, dominant traits are those that are expressed or observed in an individual when only one copy of the gene is present, while recessive traits are only observed when both copies of the gene are recessive.
Now, to determine if dominant traits are always the most common traits, we need to consider two factors: inheritance and population frequency.
Firstly, the frequency of a trait in a population is not solely determined by its dominance. Dominance does not determine how common or rare a trait is. Instead, it is influenced by various factors such as genetic variation, natural selection, and genetic drift. So, it's incorrect to assume that dominant traits are always the most common traits based solely on their dominance.
Secondly, the inheritance patterns play a crucial role in determining the frequency of dominant and recessive traits. Dominant traits tend to spread more quickly through a population because they are observable in individuals with just one copy of the gene (heterozygotes). This can result in the increase in the frequency of dominant traits over time. On the other hand, recessive traits can remain hidden in individuals with one copy of the gene and only become apparent when two copies are present (homozygotes). This can result in the persistence of recessive traits in a population, even if they are less common.
In conclusion, while dominant traits can become more common over time due to their inheritance patterns, it is not accurate to say that dominant traits are always the most common traits. Various factors influence the frequency of traits in a population, and dominance alone does not determine the commonness of a trait.