What best describes the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari?(1 point) Responses A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case. A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case. The court must review all cases where a review is requested
A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
The process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari is best described as follows:
- A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case. This means that if at least four out of the nine justices agree to review a case, a writ of certiorari may be granted.
- Once granted, the Court will then review the case in question.
- It is important to note that the Court does not review all cases where a review is requested, but rather cases that meet certain criteria and are considered significant or presenting a legal question of national importance.
The correct answer is: A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
To understand the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari, it is important to know what a "writ of certiorari" is. A writ of certiorari is an order from a higher court, such as the Supreme Court, to a lower court to send up the records of a case for review. It is a way for the Supreme Court to select which cases they will hear.
When a party wants the Supreme Court to review a case, they must file a petition for a writ of certiorari. Each year, the Supreme Court receives thousands of these petitions, but they can only select a small number of cases to actually hear.
To grant a writ of certiorari, at least four out of the nine justices must vote in favor of it. This is known as the "Rule of Four." If four or more justices vote to grant the writ, then the Court will review the case. If not enough justices vote in favor of the writ, the Court will not review the case and the decision of the lower court will stand.
Therefore, the correct answer is: A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.