Which of the following offers the best comparison between Hobbes’s and Locke’s perspectives on the divine right of kings? Choose the best option. (1 point) Responses Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad. Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad. As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings. As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings. Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs. Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs. Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.
The best option for a comparison between Hobbes’s and Locke’s perspectives on the divine right of kings is:
Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.
Locke did not support the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.
The best option is: Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.
To determine the best option that offers a comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings, we need to analyze the statements provided. Let's break down each response:
1. Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
2. As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings.
3. Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.
4. Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.
Hobbes and Locke indeed had differing perspectives on the divine right of kings. According to response 1, both philosophers saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad. This is an inaccurate statement because Hobbes, in contrast to Locke, actually supported absolute monarchies, which contradicts the idea that he saw the divine right of kings as "unnatural and bad." Hence, response 1 can be eliminated.
Response 2 suggests that both Hobbes and Locke, as Christians, accepted the divine right of kings. This statement is also incorrect. While Hobbes did believe in the divine right of kings, Locke argued for limited government and individual rights, which does not align with the acceptance of the divine right of kings. Therefore, response 2 can be eliminated.
Response 3 highlights that Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs. This statement is true and reflects Hobbes's perspective accurately. However, it does not compare his views to Locke's, so response 3 does not provide the best comparison between the two perspectives.
Finally, response 4 asserts that Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom. This statement is incorrect. Locke advocated for limited government, consent of the governed, and natural rights rather than supporting the divine right of kings. Therefore, response 4 is also incorrect.
Given the analysis, the best option that presents a comparison of Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings is option 3: "Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs."