What was the constitutional basis for overturning the Virginia
statute in Loving v. Virginia? (1 point)
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry
someone who makes less than $30,000 is protected under
the equal protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry
someone from another state is protected under the equal
protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry
someone who is more than ten years older than you is
protected under the equal protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry
someone from another race is protected under the equal
protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.
The correct answer is:
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.
The correct answer is: The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.
In the case of Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court ruled that the Virginia statute, which prohibited interracial marriages, violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Equal Protection Clause ensures that all individuals are treated equally under the law. In this case, the Supreme Court found that the Virginia statute discriminated against individuals based on their race, which violated the principle of equal protection. As a result, the court overturned the statute and declared interracial marriage bans unconstitutional.