What was the constitutional basis for overturning the Virginia statute in Loving v. Virginia? (1 point)
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who is more than ten years older than you is protected under the equal protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another state is protected under the equal protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who makes less than $30,000 is protected under the equal protection clause.
The correct answer is: The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.
The correct answer is: The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.
The correct answer is:
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.
In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court ruled that state laws banning interracial marriage violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Specifically, the Court found that these laws violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
To arrive at this answer, you should have a basic understanding of the facts of the case and the relevant constitutional provisions. The case involved Mildred Loving, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, who were convicted of violating Virginia's law banning interracial marriage. The Lovings challenged the constitutionality of the law, arguing that it violated their rights to due process and equal protection. The Supreme Court unanimously agreed, stating that the freedom to marry, regardless of race, is a fundamental right protected by the Constitution.