Which statement best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the

structure of the Roman Republic? (1 point)

Ite

Ite

Ite

Ite

The Athenian Council of 500 was responsible for military decisions whereas the Roman Republic did not have a specific body designated for military actions.

The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.

The consuls of the Roman Republic dictated the agenda of the Tribal Assembly whereas the Athenian democracy was decided by the Council of 500

O The Athenian polis was ruled by a monarch whereas the Roman Republic used two consuls.

The correct statement is:

The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.

The correct answer is:

The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.

To determine which statement best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic, we need to carefully consider the information provided for each option.

Statement 1: The Athenian Council of 500 was responsible for military decisions whereas the Roman Republic did not have a specific body designated for military actions.
- This statement highlights a difference between the two systems in terms of military decision-making. It suggests that the Athenian democracy had a specific body responsible for military decisions, while the Roman Republic did not.

Statement 2: The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.
- This statement discusses the composition of the respective governing bodies. It suggests that the Roman Republic's senate comprised wealthy patrician magistrates, while the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 consisted of citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.

Statement 3: The consuls of the Roman Republic dictated the agenda of the Tribal Assembly whereas the Athenian democracy was decided by the Council of 500.
- This statement focuses on the decision-making process within each system. It suggests that the consuls of the Roman Republic had the power to dictate the agenda of the Tribal Assembly, while the Athenian democracy was influenced by the Council of 500.

Statement 4: The Athenian polis was ruled by a monarch whereas the Roman Republic used two consuls.
- This statement highlights a significant distinction in the type of government structure used by each system. It states that the Athenian polis was ruled by a monarch, while the Roman Republic employed two consuls.

After analyzing the statements, the one that best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic is Statement 2. This option clarifies the composition of the governing bodies, highlighting the wealthy patrician magistrates in the Roman Senate, as opposed to the diverse citizens drawn by lot in the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500.