what word best describes an effecient and effective employee selection strategy
systematic
brief
democratic
complex
The word that best describes an efficient and effective employee selection strategy is "systematic." This term implies a well-organized and thorough approach to the employee selection process, which can help ensure that the right candidates are selected for the job.
The word that best describes an efficient and effective employee selection strategy is "systematic." This term suggests a well-organized and structured approach to selecting employees, which ensures that the process is thorough and consistently applied. A systematic employee selection strategy typically involves clear criteria, documented procedures, and a logical sequence of steps to identify and hire the most suitable candidates.
The word that best describes an efficient and effective employee selection strategy is "systematic."
To understand why "systematic" is the most appropriate word, it's important to consider the characteristics of an ideal employee selection strategy. An efficient and effective strategy would involve a well-structured and organized process that ensures consistency in evaluating candidates. It should also be designed to identify the most suitable candidates for a specific position or role.
Here's how you can arrive at this answer by reasoning and elimination:
1. Brief: While efficiency is important, a brief selection strategy might sacrifice effectiveness. A short and hasty process may overlook crucial aspects of an applicant's skills, experience, and fit for the job. Therefore, "brief" as a descriptor does not adequately capture the importance of a thorough employee selection strategy.
2. Democratic: While involving various stakeholders in the selection process can foster transparency and fairness, a democratic process may not guarantee efficiency. Multiple opinions and decision-making processes can lead to delays, indecisiveness, and conflicts. Consequently, "democratic" does not fully encompass the need for efficiency in the selection strategy.
3. Complex: Though an effective selection strategy might incorporate various steps and assessments, using the term "complex" does not necessarily indicate efficiency. Complexity can lead to confusion and increased time spent on decision-making. An overly complicated process might also discourage qualified candidates from participating. Therefore, "complex" does not convey the desired balance of efficiency and effectiveness.
By logically considering the characteristics and requirements of an efficient and effective selection strategy, the word that remains as the most suitable is "systematic." A systematic employee selection strategy includes well-defined steps, clear criteria and evaluations, consistency in decision-making, and a structured process that allows for efficient assessment and selection of candidates.