A minimum of five justice votes must be included for what type of opinion to be issued?(1 point) Responses majority opinion majority opinion dissenting opinion dissenting opinion per curiam opinion per curiam opinion concurrent opinion
A minimum of five justice votes must be included for a majority opinion to be issued.
What best describes the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari?(1 point) Responses The court must review all cases where a review is requested. The court must review all cases where a review is requested. A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case. A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
What type of jurisdiction gives the Supreme Court the authority to grant a writ of certiorari?(1 point) Responses appellate jurisdiction appellate jurisdiction original jurisdiction original jurisdiction Rule 10 Rule 10 appellate and original jurisdiction
The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction, which gives it the authority to grant a writ of certiorari.
hat is the contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the Supreme Court?(1 point) Responses Judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power. Judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power. Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action. Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action. Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved. Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved. Judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches.
The contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the Supreme Court is that judicial restraint means the court does not get involved in political or policy matters and defers to the decisions of the legislative and executive branches unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution. On the other hand, judicial activism means the court is more proactive in shaping laws and policies, and is willing to interpret the Constitution broadly to address social and political issues.
whats the answer
The contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the Supreme Court is that judicial restraint means the court does not get involved in political or policy matters and defers to the decisions of the legislative and executive branches unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution. On the other hand, judicial activism means the court is more proactive in shaping laws and policies, and is willing to interpret the Constitution broadly to address social and political issues.
A minimum of five justice votes must be included for a majority opinion to be issued.
To arrive at this answer, we need to understand how the Supreme Court operates. The Supreme Court consists of nine justices who hear and decide on various cases. When the justices hear a case, they discuss and deliberate on the legal issues involved. Afterward, they vote on the outcome of the case.
To issue a majority opinion, at least five justices must agree on the outcome of the case and the reasoning behind their decision. This means that a majority opinion represents the opinion of the majority of the Supreme Court justices.
Other types of opinions that might be issued include dissenting opinions, per curiam opinions, and concurrent opinions. A dissenting opinion is written by a justice or justices who disagreed with the majority opinion. A per curiam opinion is a decision issued by the court as a whole, without any specific justice being named as the author. A concurrent opinion is written by a justice or justices who agree with the majority opinion but for different reasons.
In summary, a minimum of five justice votes is required for a majority opinion to be issued by the Supreme Court.