Which statement best compares the absolutism practiced by Louis XIV and Peter the Great?(1 point) Responses Louis XIV ruled by relying on a large bureaucracy, while Peter the Great was independent of all administration. Louis XIV ruled by relying on a large bureaucracy, while Peter the Great was independent of all administration. Louis XIV needed to work constantly to expand his power, while Peter the Great was the unquestioned ruler of Russia. Louis XIV needed to work constantly to expand his power, while Peter the Great was the unquestioned ruler of Russia. Louis XIV and Peter the Great were both successful absolute rulers. Louis XIV and Peter the Great were both successful absolute rulers. Louis XIV created the illusion of absolute power, while Peter the Great was closer to a true absolute ruler.
Louis XIV and Peter the Great were both successful absolute rulers.
Which of the following statements best compares the causes of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy?(1 point) Responses While constitutional monarchy means that a king must officially be invited by another governing body, absolute monarchies can only be inherited. While constitutional monarchy means that a king must officially be invited by another governing body, absolute monarchies can only be inherited. While both usually come out of disorder and chaos, a constitutional monarchy places legal checks on the power of monarchs. While both usually come out of disorder and chaos, a constitutional monarchy places legal checks on the power of monarchs. While absolute monarchies only last for a short time, constitutional monarchies last for much longer. While absolute monarchies only last for a short time, constitutional monarchies last for much longer. While both result in one main religion, there is more religious diversity under an absolute monarchy.
While both usually come out of disorder and chaos, a constitutional monarchy places legal checks on the power of monarchs.
Which of the following statements best explains the development of constitutional monarchy in England?(1 point) Responses The idea that a monarch’s powers should not be absolute was first made law in the Magna Carta, and with the Glorious Revolution it became the basis of England’s monarchial system. The idea that a monarch’s powers should not be absolute was first made law in the Magna Carta, and with the Glorious Revolution it became the basis of England’s monarchial system. Between Charles I and the Glorious Revolution, English monarchs were in constant conflict with Parliament, eventually leading Parliament to pass the English Bill of Rights to try to keep monarchs from causing more civil wars. Between Charles I and the Glorious Revolution, English monarchs were in constant conflict with Parliament, eventually leading Parliament to pass the English Bill of Rights to try to keep monarchs from causing more civil wars. Constitutional monarchy developed because of the Magna Carta, which led to the Glorious Revolution. Constitutional monarchy developed because of the Magna Carta, which led to the Glorious Revolution. The idea that a monarch’s powers were their divine right was destroyed by the Magna Carta, and over time the English monarch became weaker and Parliament became stronger until constitutional monarchy was established.
The idea that a monarch’s powers should not be absolute was first made law in the Magna Carta, and with the Glorious Revolution it became the basis of England’s monarchial system.
The statement that best compares the absolutism practiced by Louis XIV and Peter the Great is: Louis XIV needed to work constantly to expand his power, while Peter the Great was the unquestioned ruler of Russia.
To compare the absolutism practiced by Louis XIV and Peter the Great, we can examine their ruling styles and the extent of their power. Louis XIV, also known as the Sun King, ruled France from 1643 to 1715. He employed a large bureaucracy to govern his country, relying on government officials and advisors to carry out his policies. This administrative structure allowed Louis XIV to centralize power and control various aspects of French society.
On the other hand, Peter the Great, who reigned over Russia from 1682 to 1725, took a more hands-on approach. Unlike Louis XIV, Peter the Great actively sought to modernize and Westernize Russia. He embarked on numerous reforms and initiatives, such as establishing a standing army, modernizing the navy, and introducing Western customs and institutions. Peter the Great was deeply involved in the administration of his country and often took direct control of decision-making processes.
From these descriptions, we can see that the statement "Louis XIV ruled by relying on a large bureaucracy, while Peter the Great was independent of all administration" is incorrect. Both rulers had varying degrees of involvement in the administrative affairs of their respective countries.
The statement "Louis XIV needed to work constantly to expand his power, while Peter the Great was the unquestioned ruler of Russia" is also inaccurate. While Louis XIV did engage in territorial expansion, both rulers faced challenges and worked to enhance their power throughout their reigns.
The statement "Louis XIV and Peter the Great were both successful absolute rulers" is partially true. Both Louis XIV and Peter the Great were indeed considered successful absolute rulers in their own right. They wielded significant power and left lasting legacies in their respective countries.
Considering these factors, the most accurate statement that compares the absolutism practiced by Louis XIV and Peter the Great is "Louis XIV created the illusion of absolute power, while Peter the Great was closer to a true absolute ruler." Louis XIV's elaborate court rituals and grandeur aimed to convey his absolute authority, while Peter the Great's more direct involvement in governance and reforms positioned him as a more authentic absolute ruler.