What was the constitutional basis for overturning the Virginia statute in Loving v. Virginia?(1 point)
Responses
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who is more than ten years older than you is protected under the equal protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who is more than ten years older than you is protected under the equal protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who makes less than $30,000 is protected under the equal protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who makes less than $30,000 is protected under the equal protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another state is protected under the equal protection clause.
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.
The correct response is: The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.
The correct answer is:
The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.
To arrive at this answer, you would need to understand the constitutional basis for the decision in the Loving v. Virginia case. The case involved Richard and Mildred Loving, an interracial couple who were married in the District of Columbia but convicted of violating Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute when they returned to Virginia. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of the Lovings, overturning the Virginia statute.
To find the constitutional basis for the decision, you would need to understand the equal protection clause. The equal protection clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
In the Loving v. Virginia case, the Supreme Court found that Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute violated the equal protection clause because it treated interracial marriages differently from same-race marriages. The Court held that the freedom to marry is a fundamental right that is protected by the Constitution, and that racial classifications by the state in the context of marriage violate the equal protection clause. Therefore, the ability to marry someone from another race was found to be protected under the equal protection clause.