Identify the amendment violated in the following Supreme Court case. A defendant accused of armed robbery is denied a lawyer by the government because armed robbery is not a capital crime.(1 point) Responses the Sixth Amendment the Sixth Amendment the Fifth Amendment the Fifth Amendment the First Amendment the First Amendment the Fourth Amendment
The amendment violated in this case is the Sixth Amendment.
Which of the following statements best explains why the addition of a bill of rights was necessary to ensure ratification of the Constitution?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AThe Anti-Federalists were fearful of a too powerful national government.%0D%0AThe Anti-Federalists were fearful of a too powerful national government.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe Anti-Federalists were distrustful of state governments.%0D%0AThe Anti-Federalists were distrustful of state governments.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe Federalists were distrustful of a national bill of rights being used by states.%0D%0AThe Federalists were distrustful of a national bill of rights being used by states.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe Federalists were fearful of a too powerful national government.
The statement "The Anti-Federalists were fearful of a too powerful national government" best explains why the addition of a bill of rights was necessary to ensure ratification of the Constitution.
Which of the following statements best explains how the Fourteenth Amendment increases the power of the national government?(1 point) Responses It allows the national government to prohibit voting discrimination based on race in the states. It allows the national government to prohibit voting discrimination based on race in the states. It allows the national government to practice fiscal federalism in relation to the states. It allows the national government to practice fiscal federalism in relation to the states. It allows the national government to ensure civil liberties and civil rights in the states. It allows the national government to ensure civil liberties and civil rights in the states. It allows the national government to prohibit discrimination based on gender in the states.
The statement "It allows the national government to ensure civil liberties and civil rights in the states" best explains how the Fourteenth Amendment increases the power of the national government.
The amendment violated in the provided Supreme Court case is the Sixth Amendment.
The amendment that is violated in the given scenario is the Sixth Amendment.
To arrive at this answer, we need to understand the provisions of each amendment mentioned:
- First Amendment: The First Amendment grants freedoms regarding religion, speech, assembly, and the press. It is not applicable to the given scenario.
- Fourth Amendment: The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and requires search warrants based on probable cause. It is not applicable to the given scenario.
- Fifth Amendment: The Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination, double jeopardy, and guarantees due process of law. Although it is relevant to the criminal justice system, it is not directly violated in the scenario provided.
- Sixth Amendment: The Sixth Amendment guarantees several rights to criminal defendants, including the right to a fair and speedy trial, the right to a public trial, the right to an impartial jury, the right to confront witnesses, and most importantly, the right to legal counsel. In the given scenario, the defendant is denied a lawyer despite being accused of armed robbery, violating their right to legal counsel.
Therefore, the amendment violated in the scenario is the Sixth Amendment.