Which analogy shows a part-whole relationship?(1 point)

Responses

A fin is to a fish as a nest is to a bird.
A fin is to a fish as a nest is to a bird.

A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird.
A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird.

A fin is to a fish as singing is to a bird.
A fin is to a fish as singing is to a bird.

A fin is to a fish as flight is to a bird.

A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird.

Which type of vocabulary is used to help analyze how a text is organized?(1 point)

Responses

speaking
speaking

general academic
general academic

subject-specific
subject-specific

reading

reading

Use the sentence to answer the question.

As the music sped up, Mia began to bow rapidly, causing her violin to let out a short, high pitch.

Which definition gives the technical meaning of the word bow as it is used in the sentence?

(1 point)
Responses

to propel an arrow
to propel an arrow

to bend under a heavy weight
to bend under a heavy weight

to lower the upper body in respect
to lower the upper body in respect

to play a stringed instrument

to play a stringed instrument

Use the sentence to answer the question.

The ballet dancer moved around the stage as a graceful swan moves across still waters.

What does the figurative meaning in the sentence suggest about the dancer?

(1 point)
Responses

the dancer has long arms and legs
the dancer has long arms and legs

the dancer is alone on the stage
the dancer is alone on the stage

the dancer's movements are smooth and precise
the dancer's movements are smooth and precise

the dancer's movements look like swimming

the dancer's movements are smooth and precise

Which should readers use along with explicit information to make an inference?(1 point)

Responses

what the author states directly about the topic
what the author states directly about the topic

the author's attitude about the topic
the author's attitude about the topic

their personal feelings about the topic
their personal feelings about the topic

what they already know about the topic

To determine which analogy shows a part-whole relationship, we need to understand the concept of part-whole relationships. In a part-whole relationship, one object or concept is a part or component of another object or concept.

Let's analyze each analogy to see which one demonstrates a part-whole relationship:

1. A fin is to a fish as a nest is to a bird: This analogy compares the relationship between a fin and a fish to the relationship between a nest and a bird. A fin is indeed a part of a fish, just like a nest is a part of a bird's habitat. Therefore, this analogy shows a part-whole relationship.

2. A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird: This analogy compares the relationship between a fin and a fish to the relationship between a wing and a bird. Both fins and wings are appendages that allow mobility in water and air, respectively. However, this analogy does not demonstrate a part-whole relationship since a wing is not a part of a bird in the same way that a fin is a part of a fish.

3. A fin is to a fish as singing is to a bird: This analogy compares the relationship between a fin and a fish to the relationship between singing and a bird. Singing is not a part of a bird; it is an action or behavior exhibited by some birds. Therefore, this analogy does not show a part-whole relationship.

4. A fin is to a fish as flight is to a bird: This analogy compares the relationship between a fin and a fish to the relationship between flight and a bird. Similar to the previous analogy, flight is not a part of a bird but rather a characteristic or ability possessed by certain types of birds. Hence, this analogy does not demonstrate a part-whole relationship.

Based on our analysis, the analogy that shows a part-whole relationship is:

A fin is to a fish as a nest is to a bird.