The Supreme Court case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. involved a child support dispute in which prosecutors used peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool. Analyze the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did?(1 point)
Responses
Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
The attorneys used secret trial proceedings.
The attorneys used secret trial proceedings.
The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause.
The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause.
Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994) is that peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
To analyze the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994) and determine the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did, we need to understand the details of the case and the arguments presented.
JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. involved a child support dispute in which prosecutors used peremptory challenges to exclude most of the men from the jury pool. The peremptory challenges were used solely on the basis of gender, as the prosecutors wanted an all-female jury. The defendant, JEB, argued that these peremptory challenges based on gender violated his Sixth Amendment right to a jury selected without regard to gender.
Considering the options provided, the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did is:
- Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of JEB, stating that using peremptory challenges to purposefully exclude individuals from a jury solely based on their gender was unconstitutional. The Court found that gender-based peremptory challenges violated the Equal Protection Clause and the Sixth Amendment rights of the defendant. This decision established that peremptory challenges based on gender were impermissible.
Therefore, the correct response is:
- Peremptory challenges based on gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.