Which statement best compares the absolutism practiced by Louis XIV and Peter the Great?(1 point)

Responses

Louis XIV needed to work constantly to expand his power, while Peter the Great was the unquestioned ruler of Russia.
Louis XIV needed to work constantly to expand his power, while Peter the Great was the unquestioned ruler of Russia.

Louis XIV created the illusion of absolute power, while Peter the Great was closer to a true absolute ruler.
Louis XIV created the illusion of absolute power, while Peter the Great was closer to a true absolute ruler.

Louis XIV and Peter the Great were both successful absolute rulers.
Louis XIV and Peter the Great were both successful absolute rulers.

Louis XIV ruled by relying on a large bureaucracy, while Peter the Great was independent of all administration.

Louis XIV needed to work constantly to expand his power, while Peter the Great was the unquestioned ruler of Russia.

The statement that best compares the absolutism practiced by Louis XIV and Peter the Great is: "Louis XIV created the illusion of absolute power, while Peter the Great was closer to a true absolute ruler."

To compare the absolutism practiced by Louis XIV and Peter the Great, we should look at their approaches to power and ruling.

Option 1: "Louis XIV needed to work constantly to expand his power, while Peter the Great was the unquestioned ruler of Russia."
This statement suggests that Louis XIV had to continually work to expand his power, while Peter the Great was already the unquestioned ruler of Russia. To verify this statement, we can study the historical accounts of Louis XIV's constant efforts to centralize power and expand the authority of the French monarchy. For Peter the Great, we can examine his autocratic rule and his ability to make decisions without much opposition. By comparing the historical evidence, we can determine if this statement accurately reflects the differences in their absolutist approaches.

Option 2: "Louis XIV created the illusion of absolute power, while Peter the Great was closer to a true absolute ruler."
This statement suggests that Louis XIV may have presented an illusion of absolute power, while Peter the Great was closer to being a true absolute ruler. To evaluate this statement, we can examine the actions and policies of both rulers, as well as the limitations on their power. By studying the historical context and analyzing how both rulers exercised their authority, we can determine if this statement is accurate.

Option 3: "Louis XIV and Peter the Great were both successful absolute rulers."
This statement suggests that both Louis XIV and Peter the Great were successful absolute rulers. To assess the accuracy of this statement, we can study their accomplishments, the extent of their authority, and the impacts of their rule. By examining historical records and evaluating their legacies, we can determine if both rulers can be considered successful in their practice of absolutism.

Option 4: "Louis XIV ruled by relying on a large bureaucracy, while Peter the Great was independent of all administration."
This statement suggests that Louis XIV relied on a large bureaucracy to govern, while Peter the Great was more independent from administrative structures. To verify this statement, we can study the administrative systems and structures implemented by both rulers, as well as their level of involvement in governance. By analyzing historical evidence, we can determine if this statement accurately reflects the differences in their approach to ruling.

To answer the question, carefully evaluate each statement and conduct further research on the historical context, actions, and policies of Louis XIV and Peter the Great. This will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the absolutism practiced by both rulers and allow for an accurate comparison.