Which of the following best explains the relative significance of the trans-Saharan and Indian Ocean trade routes?(1 point) Responses Trans-Saharan trade was more significant because it had more valuable resources such as salt, gold, and ivory. Trans-Saharan trade was more significant because it had more valuable resources such as salt, gold, and ivory. The Indian Ocean basin was more significant because it connected the Middle East and parts of Africa with Asia, specifically China, and it had important goods such as silk and porcelain. The Indian Ocean basin was more significant because it connected the Middle East and parts of Africa with Asia, specifically China, and it had important goods such as silk and porcelain. Neither of them was significant because both were limited in whom they could reach. Neither of them was significant because both were limited in whom they could reach. The routes were equally significant—each in its own way—as they both contributed to significant cultural developments along the routes, and worth cannot be measured simply by the goods that were traded
The Indian Ocean basin was more significant because it connected the Middle East and parts of Africa with Asia, specifically China, and it had important goods such as silk and porcelain.
Describe why religions expanded on the trade routes.(1 point) Responses Merchants were forced to convert in order to trade. Merchants were forced to convert in order to trade. War encouraged people to convert. War encouraged people to convert. It was cheaper to trade as a Muslim or Christian. It was cheaper to trade as a Muslim or Christian. Merchants and traders exchanged ideas as well as products.
Merchants and traders exchanged ideas as well as products.
Which of these continents would be difficult to connect to via the trade routes?(1 point) Responses Europe Europe Asia Asia North America North America Africa
North America
Which of the following best describes why Mehmed II continued to trade with the Genoese despite their alliance with the Byzantines?(1 point) Responses Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood. Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood. They were already trading partners. They were already trading partners. The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them. The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them. Genoa was also a Muslim kingdom and its similar faith made it a natural ally.
Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.
Which of the following best explains how physical geography impacted trade along the Silk Road?(1 point) Responses Mountains such as the Pamir Mountains made trade difficult, so traders often avoided them. Mountains such as the Pamir Mountains made trade difficult, so traders often avoided them. Deserts were flat and easy to travel across, so traders often went across them. Deserts were flat and easy to travel across, so traders often went across them. Lack of water along the Silk Road caused traders to flock to oases to survive. Lack of water along the Silk Road caused traders to flock to oases to survive. Maritime trade routes were developed throughout the Silk Road to avoid the mountains. Maritime trade routes were developed throughout the Silk Road to avoid the mountains.
Mountains such as the Pamir Mountains made trade difficult, so traders often avoided them.
To determine which of the options best explains the relative significance of the trans-Saharan and Indian Ocean trade routes, we need to understand the key factors that contributed to their importance.
1. Trans-Saharan trade route: This trade route involved the exchange of goods between the regions of North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa. Valuable resources such as salt, gold, and ivory were traded along this route. However, it's important to note that while these resources were highly sought after, the geographical limitations and challenges of crossing the desert made this route less accessible and limited its reach.
2. Indian Ocean trade route: This trade route connected the regions of the Middle East, parts of Africa, and Asia, specifically China. The Indian Ocean basin allowed for maritime trade and facilitated the exchange of goods such as silk and porcelain. The advantage of this route was its ability to connect different civilizations and regions through water transportation. This made it a more accessible and widely-used trade route compared to the trans-Saharan route.
Considering these factors, the option that best explains the relative significance is:
"The Indian Ocean basin was more significant because it connected the Middle East and parts of Africa with Asia, specifically China, and it had important goods such as silk and porcelain."
This option highlights the accessibility and reach of the Indian Ocean trade route, as well as the valuable goods exchanged along it. Moreover, it emphasizes the trade connections between different civilizations and regions, making it more significant than the limited and geographically challenging trans-Saharan trade route.