A fault cuts across several layers of rock.
What conclusion can be made?
The fault is younger than the layers of rock based on the law of crosscutting
The fault is older than the layers of rock based on the law of inclusion
The fault is older than the layers of rock based on the law of crosscutting
The fault is younger than the layers of rock based on the law of inclusion
The correct conclusion based on the given information is: The fault is younger than the layers of rock based on the law of crosscutting.
The correct conclusion that can be made is: The fault is younger than the layers of rock based on the law of crosscutting.
The correct conclusion that can be made is:
The fault is younger than the layers of rock based on the law of crosscutting.
Explanation:
The law of crosscutting relationships states that if a fault or other geological feature cuts across a rock unit, then the fault or feature is younger than the rock unit it cuts across. In this scenario, since the fault cuts across several layers of rock, it is considered to have formed after the layers of rock were already there. Therefore, the fault is younger than the layers of rock.
On the other hand, the law of inclusion states that if a rock unit contains fragments of another rock unit, the fragments must be older than the rock unit that contains them. However, the question does not mention any fragments or inclusions, so this law does not apply in this case.
So, based on the information provided, the fault is younger than the layers of rock based on the law of crosscutting.