The Wilmot Proviso said that slavery
a. would not be banned in new states.
b. could not be banned until a territory became a state.
c. could be banned in a territory only by a vote of the people.
d. would be banned in any territory acquired from Mexico
d. would be banned in any territory acquired from Mexico
d. would be banned in any territory acquired from Mexico.
To find the answer to your question about the Wilmot Proviso, you can do a quick search online or refer to a reliable source about the subject, such as a history book or a reputable website. Here's an explanation of each option to help you understand the context:
a. would not be banned in new states: This option implies that the Wilmot Proviso did not address the issue of slavery in new states, meaning it did not prohibit or restrict slavery in those regions.
b. could not be banned until a territory became a state: This suggests that the Wilmot Proviso proposed that slavery could only be banned once a territory achieved the status of statehood. In other words, slavery would be allowed in territories until they officially became states.
c. could be banned in a territory only by a vote of the people: This option suggests that the Wilmot Proviso proposed that the people living in a territory should have the power to vote on whether to permit or ban slavery within that particular territory.
d. would be banned in any territory acquired from Mexico: This choice implies that the Wilmot Proviso desired to prohibit slavery in any territories that were acquired from Mexico, regardless of the wishes of the people living in those territories.
By researching or consulting reliable sources, you can determine the correct answer to your question about the Wilmot Proviso.