Which of the following offers the best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings? (1 point)
• As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings.
Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom
• Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.
The correct answer is: Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
The best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings is that both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
To determine which of the options offers the best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings, we need to analyze each option in relation to their views.
1. "As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings."
This option suggests that both Hobbes and Locke accepted the divine right of kings. However, this statement is not accurate. Hobbes did support the divine right of kings, arguing that absolute monarchy was necessary for maintaining order and preventing chaos. On the other hand, Locke rejected the divine right of kings, advocating for limited government and the consent of the governed.
2. "Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad."
This option correctly summarizes the perspectives of both Hobbes and Locke. They both criticized the idea of divine right as unnatural and undesirable. However, it is worth noting that their reasons for opposing the divine right of kings differ, as mentioned in the previous option.
3. "Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom."
This option is incorrect as it misrepresents Locke's perspective. Locke rejected the divine right of kings and argued for a contractual relationship between the government and the people. He believed that the purpose of government was to protect individual rights and ensure the common good, rather than supporting the divine right of kings.
4. "Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs."
This option accurately reflects Hobbes's perspective. He believed in the absolute power of monarchy as a means to establish and maintain social order. However, it does not provide a comprehensive comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives.
Based on the analysis, the option that offers the best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings is:
Option 2: "Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad."