Which statement from the dissenting opinion of tinker v desmoines court decision best supports the reasoning that the conduct of the student protestors was not within the protection of the free speech of the first amendment
even a casual reading of the record shows that his armband did divvert students minds from their regular lessons and that talk comments etc made john tinker self conscious in attending school with his armband
there is also evidens that a teach of mathemetics had his lesson period practically wreckes chiefly by disputes with mary beth tinker who wore her armband for her demonstration
in cox v lousiana the court clearly stated that the rights free speech and assembly do not mean that everyone with opinions or beliefd to express may address a group at any public place and at any time
the case therefore wholly without constitutional reasons in my judgement subjects all the public schools in the country to the whims and caprices of their loudest mouthed but maybe not their brightest students
The statement "even a casual reading of the record shows that his armband did divert students minds from their regular lessons and that talk comments etc made John Tinker self conscious in attending school with his armband" best supports the reasoning that the conduct of the student protestors was not within the protection of the free speech of the First Amendment.
The statement that best supports the reasoning that the conduct of the student protestors was not within the protection of the free speech of the first amendment is: "Even a casual reading of the record shows that his armband did divert students' minds from their regular lessons and that talk comments etc made John Tinker self-conscious in attending school with his armband." This statement highlights that the conduct of the student protestors disrupted the learning environment and created a distraction for other students.
The statement from the dissenting opinion of Tinker v Des Moines Court decision that best supports the reasoning that the conduct of the student protestors was not within the protection of the free speech of the First Amendment is: "Even a casual reading of the record shows that his armband did divert students' minds from their regular lessons and that talk, comments, etc. made John Tinker self-conscious in attending school with his armband."
To find this answer, you would need to read the dissenting opinion of the Tinker v Des Moines Court decision. In this case, the majority of the Court held that students wearing armbands to protest the Vietnam War were protected by the First Amendment's free speech clause. However, there were justices who dissented from this ruling, believing that the conduct of the student protestors was disruptive and not protected speech. By reading the dissenting opinion, you can find the specific statement that supports this reasoning.