Which of the following is a logical consequence of the way the Supreme Court has interpreted the supremacy clause?(1 point)
Responses
The power of the Supreme Court was decreased.
The power of the Supreme Court was decreased.
The power of state governments was increased.
The power of state governments was increased.
The power of the president was decreased.
The power of the president was decreased.
The power of the federal government was increased.
The power of the federal government was increased.
The correct response is:
The power of the federal government was increased.
The correct answer is:
The power of the federal government was increased.
Explanation:
To understand this, let's first explain what the supremacy clause is. The supremacy clause is a clause in the United States Constitution, found in Article VI, which establishes that the Constitution and federal laws are the supreme law of the land. This means that if there is a conflict between federal and state laws, the federal law prevails.
The Supreme Court has the authority to interpret the Constitution and federal laws. Throughout history, the Supreme Court has interpreted the supremacy clause in a manner that upholds the authority of the federal government. This interpretation enhances the power of the federal government by ensuring that federal laws take precedence over conflicting state laws.
Therefore, the logical consequence of the Supreme Court's interpretation of the supremacy clause is that the power of the federal government is increased.