Which statement best identifies how the Second Amendment was interpreted in the McDonald v. Chicago case?(1 point) Responses The Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret any amendment in the Constitution. The Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret any amendment in the Constitution. The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution. The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution. The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment. The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment. The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Are the following expressions equivalent?
8(4x+2) and 32+16
(1 point)
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Identify the parts of the following expression:
5x2+4x+15
(1 point)
What is the constant:
What is the variable:
What is the exponent:
What is the coefficient of the second term:
Constant: 15
Variable: x
Exponent: 2
Coefficient of the second term: 4